Of course you're just mad, huh?
Mica I realized that you were the founder of this idea.
I do not know what to say, sincerely appreciate the goal of sending home their 'people are, not what you hate most and like many others, and I share the concern about the future of our children, but I imagine the optimism right to do so (and I believe that optimism is one of the few quality di cui dispongo).
Poi, se mi chiedi come farlo, non saprei che ricetta dare, il mondo mi sembra così complesso che mi appare impossibile poterlo rivoluzionare con un semplice invito ad un’adunata sul web. O almeno non adesso.
Credo che la gente nonostante tutto non sia ancora troppo con l’acqua alla gola per poter recepire un messaggio simile, non è sufficientemente esasperata, il livello del benessere e delle comodità è tale che alza di parecchio il grado di sopportazione di queste cose, senza contare che la “massa critica” da smuovere sarebbe tale and so that no additional contributions and media (advertising, promotion, local activism, disclosure) I think many titanic undertaking as it is impossible (has difficulty Grillo, imagine ...).
Doubt "technical" rather than chance is, that in itself has the characteristic of unpredictability and therefore free from any machine in advance, but would also limit the lead in positions of responsibility, people maybe "clean" and willing, but unfit to hold positions vital to the country, perhaps forcing the parliament to possible a continuous supply of characters, given the incompatibility of offices, losing more time to do that rather than legislate.
does not seem to avoid any possibility of forming "groups" who share the same ideas, so in the end, I believe that the incorporation of individuals would ultimately reconcile the "parties", that in itself would not be all that bad even if they were not managed as they are.
addition, you must have envy and the angry frustration of economists, technicians and professionals who would be bypassed only the chance of a draw. Hard to keep at bay the human weaknesses.
seems like a nice idea, but a bit 'too crazy. Forgive me.
But I for sympathy towards the idea and promulgated, the forwarding the same to my friends, wishing you all the luck possible.
A hug,
Stefano
Responds Marcello.
Hello, Stephen. Thank you for spending half an hour of your time to form an opinion about my crazy idea (in fact I'm writing from the department of neuro-psychiatric hospital Livorno).
As for your question-my-who are also on the possibility of being able to realize a path like the one I suggested, you refer to the answers I gave to his friend and anonymous Patrick, below. Remembering that sometimes you have to have the heart to throw the unconscious over the obstacle. Moving from the political to the professional (Without wishing to make comparisons, given the macroscopic difference of "numbers" of the two situations), even when I created the journal with colleagues and friends proofs , then become and Fox Trot Finally Fumo di China , seemed madness. But the goals that arose were achieved (the authors involved have had the opportunity to make themselves known and to start or expand a career path), and the matter has also taken other roads with the consolidation of DC, became the magazine and we all know that continues to make a positive contribution to the world of Italian comics. Lo stesso potrebbe accadere alla Bulé: crescere strada facendo e diventare anche qualche cosa di diverso (ma sempre di positivo, si spera), una volta raggiunti i suoi scopi.
Ti rimando ai post qui sotto anche per i tuoi dubbi -che non sono invece i miei- sulle difficoltà di funzionamento “tecnico” di un Parlamento tirato a sorte.
Vorrei invece spendere due parole sulla tua interessante considerazione circa il fatto che i fortunati estratti si porterebbero inevitabilmente dietro le loro idee e si finirebbe dunque per ricostruire sui banchi parlamentari quei “partiti” we wanted to cancel. True, but as you yourself say, I do not see what's wrong. I have nothing against the convictions, right, left or center that is, citizens. What I want is to eliminate the INSTITUTION party, with all the tangles gangrene that has been dragging behind. But that the individual MPs (each time different note, if chosen by lot, and not always the same faces there until death separates as it does now!) To make their own choices based on their own ideological beliefs, it is logical and desirable.
Thanks for the work of spreading the project that you propose to do in spite of everything!
0 comments:
Post a Comment