Aboma Form C Lease, Illinois

of ideas from Patrick Mandanici

Dear Marcello, who died in my post I mentioned my doubts about this proposal from the Bule. The doubts are related to two aspects of the matter: the first on the feasibility of creating a movement from nothing she can then become a majority in parliament, the second on whether to elect people to the event. On the first point: even Berlusconi is be able to vote by a majority of Italians, whatever anyone says. Agglumare for the votes of millions of people around an idea (if only one, simple), it takes superhuman effort, and money, and visibility - as well as the appeal proposal. I'm not so sure that the Italians, as well as dissatisfied politics in large numbers at the end, in front of the urn, to be so revolutionary that he gave his vote to those who did not promise anything in economic terms. 30% of abstentions are still too few to hope that they (all) should theoretically have to support a proposal such as the Bule. There is an important part of citizens - the great powers and weaker - which suits people like those who vote sono in parlamento; ma mettiamo pure che si riesca ad andarci, in parlamento: seconda questione. Come primo approdo non penso che si riuscirebber ad andarci già come maggioranza: anzi, magari all'inizio ci sarà una manciata di parlamentari. Tenendo conto che tutti gli altri partiti ovviamente isoleranno il partito pro-Bulé, la prospettiva è che passino degli anni prima che il movimento possa crescere, fuori e poi in parlamento. Qualcosa mi dice che qualcuno di questi eletti potrebbe pure prenderci gusto alla vita parlamentare - perchè no?, stipendio buono, pensione garantita per pochi anni di lavoro...

E poi: persone digiune di politica (sia la bassa che la alta) saprebbero districarsi parliamentary and legislative mechanisms? You can stand in palamento only for the sole purpose of writing a law and nothing else? Others doubt that there may be constitutional or procedural obstacles - in short, as one can be certain of the incompetence of many ministers, I am not sure 20 people to run the machinery of government, there are more employees and persons at various levels that dealing with things more complicated: these are choices that go with a certain criterion, people would know what to do if elected? They would create a line of government, business plans, etc..? The current in their incompetence, however, know very well where going with this, and also powers are present and visible in society: those elected to represent the case? Really association Confindustria type (for example) would support a change poilitico ever like this? Despite the current political and social degradation, I think that things can get worse! I could never vote a majority "at random" - not knowing my fellow citizens ...

In any case, if you really want to know that your proposal to as many people as possible is almost inevitable that you need to create a page on Facebook - is a board of marketing!

Responds Marcello

Thanks for giving me first "repeated" your comments that I carelessly deleted the blog.

Your doubts about the feasibility of my project is also mine. I suggested a route, that of "party to the project," and I realize that there are many, and many but if, on a journey like that. That even if he could leave may also risk becoming very long and get lost on the road, as it probably is going to the League, now a prisoner of slogan less and less credible and forced to chase (and at the same plant) neorazziste instances of the most ignorant and fearful electorate. Although, to avoid any representative of Bule can "take taste", just put it that the candidates of the party, for consistency, must be chosen with a draw among all the aspirants, and / or that no one can remain in office for more than one term.

To me, however, affects the goal: get rid of the caste of politicians through the election by drawing lots. So if someone (who knows perhaps better than I do the current legislative situation) has other ideas to achieve that result, they are welcome. If there was the possibility to organize a referendum proactive indicate the one way, and probably the Italians who at the time the majority voted for the abolition of public funding to political parties, now would vote for the abolition of political parties altogether. Unfortunately, and perhaps not coincidentally, to know what our legislators have provided only the recall referendum, among other things, had enough weapons to blunt the abuse if they have done. However, all the best of my viable are welcome.

until you arrive (or do not occur to me), for my part I will continue to support this madness of the party in the project.

On the substance of Bule, however, let me disagree with you when you say that you could never vote for (and in any case you should not do: instead of the urn, there would be issues of the bag Bingo!) a majority "at random", not knowing your fellow citizens. Why, now you know them? From "porcellum" on, the lists if the parties are in office, and we can just vote blindly. And that's just the first things to go better. Candidates who choose them, however, the parties, and whether you agree with the ideas of the party, the person you had no choice really! I remember, back when I lived in the province of Milan, un anno l'Ulivo propose per candidato locale un impresentabile, inconsistente, mellifluo ex-democristiano con la faccia da schiaffi! O quello, o un altro partito! Dov'era la scelta?

Meglio, mooolto meglio allora i candidati designati dalla sorte, confidando che le menti migliori della società si candidino in massa... e ci arrida un po' di fortuna.

Poi, so benissimo che per il funzionamento del Governo e del Parlamento occorrono competenze. E il mio progetto non le esclude affatto. Se i singoli parlamentari fossero estratti a sorte (e per votare a favore o contro le leggi proposte può be sufficient-or better is desirable-even the "good sense of the father / mother of the family"), for the ministers I anticipated that civil society can be chosen based on their own skills. While the prime minister, in my opinion, it MUST be one of the randomly selected (out of 300-400, there will be a pure culture and with sufficient intelligence to play that role) to prevent the Berlusconi did turn out the door falls by window. And it is obvious that even secretaries, secretaries and consultants in various ways can be found in civil society on the basis of their expertise and, hopefully, also their merits. So I do not see why the institutions, then point, it should work. I'll be a hopeless dreamer and optimist, but in my opinion, "made out" parties with all the interests that they bring with them, work better than now!

Thanks for your suggestion to land on Facebook. I will.